RESPONSIBILITY OF YOUTH TOWARDS OLDER AND FUTURE GENERATIONS
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2020-2-34-45
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to study the content, structure and predictors of the phenomenon of responsibility to previous and future generations among representatives of generations Y and Z. Methodology and Approach. The study was conducted by the questionnaire survey of youth of Kursk, Chelyabinsk and Arzamas (N = 463). Of these, representatives of generations Y (N = 169) and Z (N = 292). The methods of assessing social responsibility, generativity, value orientations, faith in the justice of the world, and attitudes to global risks are used. Results. The analysis showed that the responsibility to previous and future generations among young people of generations Y and Z has both common and different characteristics. Predictors of these characteristics are revealed. Theoretical and Practical implications. The features of the structure of social responsibility in two generations of youth, the socio-psychological factors associated with it and its predictors are shown for the first time.
About the Authors
T. P. Emelyanova
Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. V. Belyh
Autonomous Non-Profit Organization of Additional Professional Education “Rosatom Technical Academy”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Емельянова Т. П., Нестик Т. А., Белых Т. В. Отношение к экологическим рискам среди представителей поколений Y и Z // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология. 2019. Т. 4. № 3 (15). URL: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/cntnt/bloks/dop-menu/archive/n2018.html (дата обращения: 13.04.2020).
2. Нестик Т. А., Дмитриева Ю. А., Кузнецова О. Е., Ларина Г. Н., Николаев Е. Л. Ответственность личности перед предшествующими и будущими поколениями: теоретико-эмпирическое исследование // Вопросы психологии. 2019. № 3. С. 1-13.
3. Нестик Т. А., Журавлев А. Л. Психология глобальных рисков. М., 2018. 402 с.
4. Полякова М. К. Теоретические подходы к пониманию генеративности: проблемы и перспективы [Электронный ресурс] // Мир науки. Педагогика и психология. 2019. Т. 7. № 6. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/77PSMN619.pdf (дата обращения: 13.04.2020).
5. Полякова М. К., Стрижицкая О. Ю. Генеративность и особенности социальной сферы взрослого // Психологические исследования. 2017. Т. 10. № 51. URL: http://psystudy.ru (дата обращения: 13.04.2020).
6. Шамис Е., Антипов А. Теория поколений // Маркетинг. Менеджмент. 2007. № 6. С. 42-46.
7. Cox K. S., Wilt J., Olson B., McAdams D. P. Generativity, the big five, and psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults // Journal of Personality. 2010. № 78. P. 1185-1208.
8. Erikson E. H. Identity, youth, crisis. New York. 1968. 336 p.
9. Lawford H. L., Ramey H. L. “Now I Know I Can Make a Difference”: Generativity and Activity Engagement as Predictors of Meaning Making in Adolescents and Emerging Adults // Developmental Psychology: advance online publication. 2015, July 27th. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000034 (дата обращения: 13.04.2020).
10. Milfont T. L., Sibley C. G. Exploring the concept of environmental generativity // International Journal of Hispanic Psychology. 2011. № 4. P. 21-30.
11. Morselli D., Passini S. Measuring prosocial attitudes for future generations: The Social Generativity Scale // Journal of Adult Development. 2015. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 173-182.
12. Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. New York, 1991. 649 p.
Review
Views:
120
Email this article 