RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF INDIVIDUAL WELL-BEING AND SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Abstract
Aim. The purpose of this work is to consider changes in the social interaction of the individual associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, expressed in forced social distancing. Methodology. During the study, methods of theoretical and methodological analysis, analysis of panel data, generalization and interpretation of the results were applied. Results. Multilevel analyzes have shown that despite the pervasive psychological impact of COVID-19, some people cope with collective constraints more adaptively than others and maintain optimal levels of well-being and mental health. It has been shown that after intensive social distancing, extroverts show a more pronounced subjective decrease in psychological well-being than introverts. This indicates that social distancing, as a necessary means of containing the spread of COVID-19, inadvertently reduces the psychological well-being of an individual with a high externality. Research implications. This article highlights the problem of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological well-being of the individual, shows the features of the relationship between the psychological determinants of the individual and forced social distancing during the pandemic.
About the Author
Natalia V. NikolaevaRussian Federation
PhD (Psychology), headmaster of the scientific center, head of the programs of scientific international internships and exchange of experience of the Scientific and information center ART. SPIN-5106-4791
References
1. Anikeeva, I. V. Korrelyatsii simptomov trevogi, depressii i psikhicheskogo blagopoluchiya, svyazannykh s COVID-19: perekrestnoe issledovanie respondentov iz Velikobritanii // Regional'nye aspekty upravleniya, ekonomiki i prava Severo-Zapadnogo federal'nogo okruga Rossii. – 2022. – № 1 (55). – P. 54–63.
2. Anikeeva, I. V. Psikhologicheskie reaktsii i svyazannye s nimi faktory na nachal'nom etape epidemii COVID-19 sredi naseleniya Kitaya // Regional'nye aspekty upravleniya, ekonomiki i prava Severo-Zapadnogo federal'nogo okruga Rossii. – 2022. – № 2 (56). – P. 29–41.
3. Vey, M. A. Empiricheskoe issledovanie svyazi mezhdu introversiey i psikhologicheskim vozdeystviem kosvennykh izmeneniy, svyazannykh s COVID19. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.561609 (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2022).
4. Gupta, K. M. Vzaimosvyaz' mezhdu lichnostnymi parametrami i psikhologicheskim blagopoluchiem studentov vuzov vo vremya pandemii. // Zhurnal global'nykh resursov. – 2021. – № 6 (01a). – P. 10–19.
5. Dinerov, E. I. Sub"ektivnoe blagopoluchie // Psikhologicheskiy byulleten'. – 2021. – Vyp. 95 (3). – P. 542–575.
6. Kayasheva, O. I. Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie lichnosti v situatsii perezhivaniya krizisa / O. I. Kayasheva, N. V. Nikolaeva // Chelovek kak predmet mezhdistsiplinarnogo gumanitarnogo poznaniya: Sbornik nauchnykh statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 11–12 dekabrya 2014 goda / Otv. red. L.F. Uvarova, E.V. Fedosenko. – SPb., NITs ART , 2015. – S. 315-321. – EDN TXYDQJ.
7. Kosta, P.T., MakKrey, R.R. Vliyanie ekstraversii i nevrotizma na sub"ektivnoe blagopoluchie: schastlivye i neschastlivye lyudi // Zhurnal lichnosti i sotsial'noy psikhologii. – 2019. – № 38 (4) – S. 668–678.
8. Nikolaeva, N. V. Issledovanie lichnosti v psikhologii. Metodiki izucheniya napravlennosti lichnosti / N. V. Nikolaeva // Prakticheskaya psikhologiya lichnosti / Pod redaktsiey O. I. Kayashevoy, N. V. Nikolaevoy. – SPb., NITs ART, 2017. – S. 87-109. – EDN ZOQAJF.
9. Nikolaeva, N. V. Krizisnoe konsul'tirovanie i psikhokorrektsiya v modelyakh ekstrennoy psikhologicheskoy pomoshchi / N. V. Nikolaeva // Psikhologiya lichnosti: izuchenie, razvitie, samopoznanie : Sbornik nauchnykh materialov / Pod obshch. red. O.I. Kayashevoy, N.V. Nikolaevoy. – Vyp. 3. – SPb : NITs ART, 2015. – S. 90-97. – EDN VGSNKV.
10. Nikolaeva, N. V. Samootsenka i Ya-kontseptsiya kak sredstvo obespecheniya vnutrenney soglasovannosti lichnosti / N. V. Nikolaeva, K. G. Borzova // Psikhologiya lichnosti: izuchenie, razvitie, samopoznanie: Sbornik nauchnykh materialov / Pod red. O.I. Kayashevoy, N.V. Nikolaevoy – SPb : NITs ART, 2014. – S. 18-23. – EDN TGOXWZ.
11. Nikolaeva, N. V. Eksperimental'noe issledovanie lichnostnykh osobennostey perezhivaniya krizisnoy situatsii / N. V. Nikolaeva // Psikhologiya lichnosti: izuchenie, razvitie, samopoznanie: Sbornik nauchnykh materialov / Pod red. O.I. Kayashevoy, N.V. Nikolaevoy. – SPb : NITs ART, 2014. – S. 50-59. – EDN TGOYAB.
12. Khristyuk, N. A. Sostradanie vo vremya koronavirusa. Vashington Post. 12 marta, 2020 [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https:// www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/11/ compassion-time-coronavirus (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2022).
13. Sharapov, R. V. Individual'nye razlichiya i izmeneniya v sub"ektivnom blagopoluchii na rannikh stadiyakh pandemii COVID-19 // Sovremennoe obrazovanie: traditsii i innovatsii. – 2021. – № 4. – S. 152-157.
14. Yakundina, A. G. Vzaimosvyaz' mezhdu fizicheskoy aktivnost'yu i psikhicheskim zdorov'em v vyborke naseleniya Velikobritanii: perekrestnoe issledovanie vo vremya realizatsii mer sotsial'nogo distantsirovaniya COVID-19. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100345 (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2022).
15. Gelfand, M. J., Jackson, J. C., Pan, X., Nau, D., Dagher, M., Van Lange, P., & Chiu, C. Y. The importance of cultural tightness and government efficiency for understanding COVID-19 growth and death rates. –PsyArXiv. – 2020. – P. 289.
16. Liu, S., Lithopoulos, A., Zhang, C. Q., Garcia-Barrera, M. A., & Rhodes, R. E. Personality and perceived stress during COVID-19 pandemic: Testing the mediating role of perceived threat and efficacy // Personality and individual differences. – 2020. – Vol. 168. – P. 337-351.
17. Morales-Vives, F., Due˜nas, J. M., Vigil-Colet, A., & Camarero-Figuerola, M. Psychological variables related to adaptation to the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain // Frontiers in Psychology. – 2020. – Vol. 11. – Р. 243.
Email this article 