Satisfaction with marriage as a factor of socio-psychological adaptation of women who married foreigners
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2022-3-120-132
Abstract
Aim. To study the influence of the factor of satisfaction with marriage on the success of sociopsychological adaptation of women who married foreigners.
Methodology. The study was conducted based on social networks using a Google form. The sample consisted of 65 women who moved to a new country in connection with marriage with foreigners, of which 41 were satisfied with their marriage and 24 were not satisfied. The following methods were used: “Questionnaire of interpersonal relations” edited by A. Rukavishnikova, “Types of Ethnic Identity” by G. U. Soldatova and S. V. Ryzhova, Rogers-Diamond’s “Test Questionnaire for Social and Psychological Adaptation” edited by A. K. Osnitsky. To analyze the obtained data, descriptive statistics and correlation analysis the Spearman correlation coefficient were used.
Results revealed differences in adaptation between groups of women who were satisfied and dissatisfied with their relationships. It was found that these differences can be assessed from the perspective of interpersonal communication. The type of ethno-cultural adaptation is not associated with differences in the adaptation of women who moved to a new country due to marriage.
Research implications. Lie in clarifying the ideas about the factors influencing the success of the socio-psychological adaptation of women who married foreigners. The data obtained can be used by practical psychologists and social workers to provide adequate assistance and support.
About the Authors
O. I. Mironova
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana I. Mironova – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences
ul. Myasnitskaya, 20, Moscow 101000
L. A. Ruonala
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lydia A. Ruonala – Postgraduate Student, Department of Social Psychology
ul. Very Voloshinoy 24, Mytiсhshi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Anan’eva N. A. [Anthropocentric phenomenology of interpersonal contact: in memory of Lev Borisovich Filonov (01.08.1925—11.04.2016)]. In: Chelovecheskij kapital [Humans’ capital], 2018, no. 6 (114), pp. 42–57.
2. Soldatova G. U., Shaigerova L. A. [Reflection upon multiplicity of choice in psychology of intercultural communication]. In: Psihologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], 2015, vol. 8, no. 40. Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 20.05.2022).
3. Stefanenko T. G. Etnopsihologiya [Ethnopsychology]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., Academical project Publ., 1999. 320 p.
4. Endryushko A. A. [Theoretical approaches to studying the adaptation of migrants in the host society: foreign experience]. In: Vestnik Instituta sociologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 2017, no. 4, pp. 45–70.
5. Alarcгo V. Fertility, Migration and Acculturation (FEMINA): a research protocol for studying intersectional sexual and reproductive health inequalities // Reproductive Health: [сайт]. 2019. № 16. URL: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
6. Berry J. W. Theories and models of acculturation // The Oxford Handbook of Acculturation and Health / Ed. S. J. Schwartz, J. Unger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. P. 15–28.
7. Berry J. W. Migrant acculturation and adaptation // The Oxford Textbook of Migrant Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. P. 311–318.
8. Carroll H., Luzes M. The migration journey and mental health: Evidence from Venezuelan forced migration [Электронный ресурс] // SSM-Population Health. 2020. №10. URL: http://www.elsevier.com (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
9. Crawford C. Decolonizing Reproductive Labor: Caribbean Women, Migration, and Domestic Work in the Global Economy // The Global South. № 12. P. 33–55.
10. Gerber R., Wanner P. De-Qualification and De-Emancipationamong Recently Arrived Highly Skilled Immigrant Women in Switzerland [Электронный ресурс] // The National Centres of Competence in Research. 2019. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
11. Maduforo E. Trafficking of Nigerian Women and Young Girls for Sex Trade and Forced Servitude in Europe // International Journal of African and Asian Studies. 2021. № 73. P. 32–48.
12. McKowen K., Borneman J. Digesting Difference: Migrants, Refugees, and Incorporation in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 276 p.
13. Murniati T. Migrant Crossing Borders: Bridging Cultural Difference and Securing a Third Space in the Host Country // Jurnal Ilmiah Lingua Idea. 2020. № 1. P. 70–79.
14. Mussino E., Cantalini S. Multiple-origin and Multiple-destination: the fertility of migrants in Europe [Электронный ресурс] // Stockholm Research Reports in Demography. 2020. № 47. URL: https://www.su.se. (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
15. Mussino E., Gabrielli G. Fertility Intentions Within a 3-Year Time Frame: a Comparison Between Migrant and Native Italian Women [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2020. URL: https://link.springer.com (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
16. Peters R., Amugsi D. A., et al. Nutrition transition, overweight and obesity among rural-to-urban migrant women in Kenya [Электронный ресурс] // Public Health Nutrition. 2019. Vol. 17. № 22. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
17. Pongthippat P., östlund G. Illuminating Health Aspects for Immigrant Thai Women Living in Swedish Transnational Marriages [Электронный ресурс] // BMC Women Health. 2021. URL: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-923410/v1 (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
Review
Views:
174
Email this article 