Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Psychology

Advanced search

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SELF-ASSESSMENTS, IMPLICIT THEORIES OF RISK AND MEDICAL WORKERS’ PERSONAL RISK READINESS

https://doi.org/ 10.18384/2310-7235-2017-4-6-19

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the relationships between self-assessed readiness to risk, implicit theories of risk and personal risk readiness in the following comparative analysis of samples: 1) medical versus non-medical students (the latter also specializing in a “human-to-human” type of profession) and 2) medical students versus practicing doctors. Differences in the measured variables were analyzed between the two student groups and the sample of doctors (the latter was compared with medical students). For each of the three groups, the relationships between all the measured variables were identified and the intergroup differences in the established relationships were described. It is identifies that the doctors to a greater extent rather than medical students perceive risk as “insufficiency of rationality” and as “an impossibility to prognosticate”. For medical students, an implicit theory of “hedonistic risk” is expressed to a greater extent than in case with the doctors. For all three samples, links are established between self-assessed readiness to risk and the implicit theory of “deliberate risk”. But only for medical students, this self-assessment is significantly associated with the implicit theory of “hedonistic risk”.

About the Authors

Tatiana Bogacheva
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


Nataliya Kornilova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


Yulia Krasavtseva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Бороздина Л.В. Сущность самооценки и ее соотношение с Я-концепцией // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология. 2011. № 1. С. 54-65.

2. Канеман Д. Думай медленно.. решай быстро. М., 2013. 656 с.

3. Канеман Д., Словик П., Тверски А. Принятие решений в неопределенности. Харьков, 2005. 632 с.

4. Корнилова Т.В. Диагностика мотивации и готовности к риску. М., 1997. 231 c.

5. Корнилова Т.В. Интеллектуально-личностный потенциал человека в условиях неопределенности и риска. СПб., 2016. 344 с.

6. Корнилова Т.В. Психология риска и принятия решений. М., 2003. 286 с.

7. Корнилова Т.В., Веденеева Н.В. Самоэффективность и ретроспективные самооценки, проявляемые при личностном выборе для себя и предполагаемые при выборе за другого человека // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Психологические науки. 2014. № 2. С. 6-17.

8. Корнилова Т.В., Чумакова М.А., Корнилов С.А., Новикова М.А. Психология неопределенности: единство интеллектуально-личностного потенциала человека. М., 2010. 334 с.

9. Ординова Е.М. Изучение имплицитных теорий как составляющих когнитивного риска // Психологический журнал. 2013. Т. 34. № 1. С. 74-85.

10. Стернберг Р., Форсайт Б., Хедланд Дж., Григоренко Е.Л. Практический интеллект. СПб., 2002. 272 с.

11. Талеб Н.Н. Черный лебедь. Под знаком непредсказуемости. М., 2013. 736 с.

12. Bari A., Khan R.A., Rathore A.W. Medical errors; causes, consequences, emotional response and resulting behavioral change // Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016. Vol. 32 (3). P. 523-528.

13. Furnham A. Self-estimated intelligence, psychometric intelligence and personality // Psychologia. 2005. Vol. 48. P. 182-192.

14. Gigerenzer G., Gaissamaier W., Kurz-Milcke E., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics // Psychological science in the public interest. 2007. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 53-96.

15. Iannello P., Mottini A., Tirelli S., Riva S., Antonietti A. Ambiguity and uncertainty tolerance, need for cognition, and their association with stress. A study among Italian practicing physicians // Medical Education Online. 2017. Vol. 22 (1) (дата обращения: 03.12.2017).

16. Kuhn G., Goldberg R., Compton S. Tolerance for Uncertainty, Burnout, and Satisfaction With the Career of Emergency Medicine // Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2009. Vol. 54 (1). P. 106-113.

17. Nevalainen M., Kuikka L., Pitkälä K. Medical errors and uncertainty in primary healthcare: A comparative study of coping strategies among young and experienced GPs // Scandinavian journal of primary health care. 2014. Vol. 32. P. 1-6.

18. Operskalski J.T., Barbey A.K. Risk literacy in medical decision-making // Science Translational Medicine. 2016. Vol. 352 (6284). P. 413-414.


Review

Views: 53


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5113 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5105 (Online)