Ethnic Attitudes and Preferable Coping Strategies within Situational Context
Abstract
The article examines the interconnection of
Moscow youngsters ethnic attitudes and preferable strategies
of coping with stressful situations having situational context.
The research involved 105 people aged 16 to 19 years,
being high school students and first-year university students.
The subjects of the research were offered to recollect and
give a detailed verbal description of a stressful situation. This
article describes the way the designation of a stressful situation,
connected with the nationality phenomenon, influence
the choice of coping strategies and ethnic attitudes. The results
indicate differences in using the strategy of responsibility
acceptance, in patriotic and neutral ethnic attitudes among
youngsters, who described various stressful situations.
Moscow youngsters ethnic attitudes and preferable strategies
of coping with stressful situations having situational context.
The research involved 105 people aged 16 to 19 years,
being high school students and first-year university students.
The subjects of the research were offered to recollect and
give a detailed verbal description of a stressful situation. This
article describes the way the designation of a stressful situation,
connected with the nationality phenomenon, influence
the choice of coping strategies and ethnic attitudes. The results
indicate differences in using the strategy of responsibility
acceptance, in patriotic and neutral ethnic attitudes among
youngsters, who described various stressful situations.
About the Author
А. Фомичева
Московский городской психолого-педагогический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Брайт Д., Джонс Ф. Стресс. Теории, исследова- ния, мифы. - СПб., 2003. - 352 с.
2. Журавлев А.Л. Психология коллективного субъ- екта // Психология индивидуального и груп- пового субъекта / под ред. А.В. Брушлинского,М.И. Воловиковой. - М., 2002. - С. 51-81.
3. Крюкова Т.Л., Куфтяк Е.В. Опросник способов совладания (Адаптация методики WCQ) // Пси- хологическая диагностика, 2005. - № 3. - С. 57- 76.
4. Крюкова Т.Л. Психология совладающего поведе- ния в разные периоды жизни: дис. …д-ра пси- хол. наук. - Кострома, 2005. - 473 с.
5. Майерс Д. Социальная психология / перев. с англ. - СПб., 1999. - 688 с.
6. Нартова-Бочавер С.К. «Coping behaviour» в си- стеме понятий психологии личности // Психоло- гический журнал, 1997. - Т. 18. - № 5. - С. 20-30.
7. Солдатова Г.У., Нестик Т.А., Шайгерова Л.А. Принципы формирования толерантности и управления рисками ксенофобии // Националь- ный психологический журнал, 2011. - № 2. - С. 60-80.
8. Стефаненко Т.Г. Этнопсихология: Учебник для вузов. - М., 2009. - 368 с.
9. Хухлаев О.Е. Этнонациональные установки мо- сковских старшеклассников в условиях совмест- ного обучения с мигрантами // Психологическая наука и образование, 2009. - № 1. - С. 5-12.
10. Хухлаев О.Е., Кузнецов И.М. Национализм как социально-психологический феномен: к поста- новке вопроса // Акмеология, 2008. -№ 3. - С. 118-125; № 4. - С. 111-118.
11. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Weintraub J.K. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989. - № 56. - P. 267-283.
12. Fiefel H., Strack S. Coping with conflict situations: Middle aged and elderly men // Psychology and Aging, 1989. - № 4. - P. 26-33.
13. Henry P.J., Sears D.O. The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale // Political Psychology, 2002. - № 23. - P. 253- 283.
14. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. - N.Y., 1984. - P. 218-255.
15. McConahay J.B. Modern Racism, Ambivalence and the Modern Racism Scale // Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism. Orlando, 1986. - P. 91-125.
16. McCrae R.R. Situational determinants of coping responses: Loss, threat and Challenge // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984. - Vol. 46. - №. 4. - P. 919-928.
Review
Views:
38
Email this article 