IN SEARCH OF A NEW PARADIGM OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Abstract
The article analyses the reasons of the
organizational psychology crisis. The author states that
they are due to the limited character of the confrontational
paradigm, as it is within this paradigm the organizational
psychology has been formed and being developed until now.
The article presents a new approach, in the bases of which the
organization is understood as some continuous and dynamic
contradiction. The author gives as an example his own
research of a corporate culture where he singles out three
components and two basic levels. External manifestations
of culture, proclaimed values and interior value orientations
are the components. Management subculture and staffs
subculture are the two basic levels. According to the
given approach it is clear that any organizations culture is
contradictory. The author considers inter-level contradictions
to have basic character. Every level can have its own
peculiarities in all the tree components. It is stated that the
general tendency of the corporate culture development is
aimed at joining the two levels in all the components.
organizational psychology crisis. The author states that
they are due to the limited character of the confrontational
paradigm, as it is within this paradigm the organizational
psychology has been formed and being developed until now.
The article presents a new approach, in the bases of which the
organization is understood as some continuous and dynamic
contradiction. The author gives as an example his own
research of a corporate culture where he singles out three
components and two basic levels. External manifestations
of culture, proclaimed values and interior value orientations
are the components. Management subculture and staffs
subculture are the two basic levels. According to the
given approach it is clear that any organizations culture is
contradictory. The author considers inter-level contradictions
to have basic character. Every level can have its own
peculiarities in all the tree components. It is stated that the
general tendency of the corporate culture development is
aimed at joining the two levels in all the components.
References
1. Беннис У., Нанус Б. Лидеры. - СПб., 1995. - 324 с.
2. Занковский А.Н. Анализ базовых «координат» организационных культур: когнитивные репре- зентации организационных понятий в сознании российских и японских менеджеров // Психоло- гический журнал, 1996. - № 3. - с. 46-57.
3. Занковский А.Н. Организационная психоло- гия. -М., 2009. - 648 с.
4. Петренко В.Ф. Введение в экспериментальную семантику: исследование форм репрезентации в обыденном сознании. - М., 1983. - 176 с.
5. Спивак В.А. Корпоративная культура. - СПб., 2001. - 284 с.
6. Шайн Э. Организационная культура и лидер- ство. - М., 2000. - 194 с.
7. Файоль А. Общее и промышленное управление.- М., 1924. - 84 с.
8. Франсела Ф., Баннистер Б. Новый метод исследо- вания личности. - М., 1987. - 186 с.
9. Blake R.R. & Mouton J.S. The Managerial Grid.- Houston: Gulf., 1964. - 324 p.
10. Cameron K.S., & Quinn R.E. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. - Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1999. - 218 p.
11. Harris P.P. & Moran R.T. Managing Cultural Differences. - Gulf Publishing Company, 1991. - 246 p.
12. Мисуми Дзюдзи. Ридасиппу кодо-но кагаку / Поведенческая наука лидерства (на японском языке). - Токио: Юхикаку, 1984. - 312 p.
13. Roethlisberger F.J., & Dickson W.J. Management and the Worker. - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1939. - 464 p.
Review
Views:
91
Email this article 