Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Psychology

Advanced search

PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE PERSONALITY OF CYBERBULLING PARTICIPANTS IN POPULAR SOCIAL NETWORKS

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2020-3-29-43

Abstract

The research is devoted to the insufficiently known Internet-phenomenon - cyber-bullying in social networks. Cyber-bullying is a new field of knowledge and science, that is why there is a lack of scientific terminological base. Aim. To analyze the personal characteristics of cyber-bullying participants actively included in popular social networks. Methodology. The research was performed in on-line format. The respondents were offered a survey and a psychodiagnostic examination in accordance with the tasks of the study. The empirical research included the methods of a survey and testing. Results. The analysis of the features and transformations of the role structure of cyber-bullying in the network compared to the real-life bullying among users of popular social networks made it possible to reveal personal characteristics and behavioral strategies of its participants. Special attention should be paid to the “observers” of cyber-bullying: the more the respondent is an “observer” the more it is the possible for him to become the “initiator” of cyber-bullying (the moderate positive correlation between the scales “observer” and “initiator”). On the one hand, the previous experience of being an aggressor in the on-line context can become the factor which intensifies the negative behavior of observers. On the other hand, constant following the bullying in the net can result in the loss of sensitivity to other people’s feelings and may also result in fixing destructive forms of behavior owing to the feeling of impunity and anonymity in the on-line environment. Research implications. The results of the analysis of role profiles can be used for timely diagnostics of risk groups and improve the work of psychological services and specialized sites for the prevention of cyber-bullying.

About the Authors

M. M. Mishina
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation


K. A. Vorobyeva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation


References

1. Асмолов А. Г., Семенов А. Л., Уваров А. Ю. Российская школа и новые информационные технологии: взгляд в следующее десятилетие. М., 2010. 84 с.

2. Бочавер А. А., Хломов К. Д. Кибербуллинг: травля в пространстве современных технологий // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. Т. 11. № 3. C. 177-191.

3. Воробьева К. А. Воздействие демонстрации в СМИ сцен насилия на развитие личности подростков // Воспитание школьников. 2019. №8. С. 37-43.

4. Зинцова А. С. Социальная профилактика кибербуллинга // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. Социальные науки. 2014. № 3 (35). С. 122-128.

5. Кривцова С. В., Белевич А. А., Шапкина А. Н. Школьный буллинг: об опыте исследований распространённости буллинга в школах Германии, Австрии, России // Образовательная политика. 2016. Т. 3. № 73. С. 2-25.

6. Мишина М. М., Мурсалыева Г. М. Сравнительный анализ формирования типов этнической идентичности подростков разных культурных сред // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Психологические науки. 2018. № 1. С. 84-94. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7235-2018-1-84-93

7. Солдатова Г. У., Ярмина А. Н. Кибербуллинг: особенности, ролевая структура, детско-родительские отношения и стратегии // Национальный психологический журнал. 2019. № 3 (35). С. 17-31.

8. Федунина Н. Ю. Представления о триаде «Преследователь - жертва - наблюдатель» в кибербуллинге в англоязычной литературе [Электронный ресурс] // Психологические исследования. 2015. Т. 8. № 41. URL: http://psystudy.ru/num/2015v8n41/1143-fedunina41 (дата обращения: 10.06.2020).

9. Шумакова Е. В. Воспитательное пространство социальных сетей интернета // Профессиональное образование. Столица. 2011. № 6. С. 39-40.

10. Barlinska J., Szuster A., Winiewski M. Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2013. № 23. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137 (дата обращения: 22.06.2019).

11. Cassidi W., Jackson M. Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixelshurt me? // School Psychology International. 2009. № 30. P. 83-402.

12. Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents / A. DeSmet, S. Bastiaensens, K. Van Cleemput, K. Poels, H. Vandebosch, G. Cardon, I. De Bourdeaudhuij // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. № 57. P. 398-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051.

13. Edeberg G., Thorvaldsen S., Ronning J. A. The Impact of cyberbullying and cyber harassment on academic achievements // Digital Expectations and Experiences in Education. 2016. P. 183-204.

14. Patchin J. W., Hinduja S. Digital self-harm among adolescents // Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017. № 61(6). Pp. 761-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth. 2017.06.012.

15. Sari S. V. Was it just joke? Cyberbullying perpetrations and their styles of humor. // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. № 54. Pp. 555-559. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.053

16. Ybarra M. L., Mitchell K. J. Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics // Journal of child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2004. № 45 (7). P. 1308-1316. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1469-7610.2004.00328.


Review

Views: 295


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5113 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5105 (Online)