Preview

Psychological Sciences

Advanced search

Psychological Conditions for Actualizing Development Resources and Overcoming Barriers to Multi-Subject Interaction Between Teachers and Students

https://doi.org/10.18384/3033-6414-2026-2-116-129

Abstract

Aim. Theoretical and analytical substantiation, experimental verification and integration into the educational process of the university of technology actualization of such resource complexes as “reflexive projecting” and “engagement-involvement.”

Methodology. A specially developed methodological program was used, including diagnostic techniques and technology for updating resources (stages, processes, modules, psychotechnics) with students of a pedagogical university (n=84).

Results. For the first time, a set of psychological conditions for the actualization of teachers’ development resources through the introduction of integrative technology has been identified. After the implementation of the technology, students experienced an increase in their involvement in the learning process and a multi-subject community due to the complementary components of the reflective design resource.

Research implications. The technology and resource actualization programs “reflexive projecting” and “engagement-involvement” for student teachers have been developed, integrated into the educational process of the university and have proven their effectiveness, which allows us to recommend this complex for implementation in the pedagogical education system.

About the Authors

Ju. I. Vostokova
Federal Scientific Centre of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research; National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Arzamas branch
Russian Federation

Julia I. Vostokova (Arzamas, Moscow) – Senior Lecturer, Department of General and Practical Psychology, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Arzamas branch; Researcher of Federal Scientific Centre of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research



G. V. Mitin
Federal Scientific Centre of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research
Russian Federation

Georgy V. Mitin (Moscow) – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Leading Researcher



References

1. Karpov, A. V. (2023). Psyche and Time. Vol. 2. Functioning. Genesis. Representations. Yaroslavl: Filigree publ. (in Russ.).

2. Prokhorov, A. O. & Chernov, A. V. (2025). Dynamics of Mental Regulation of Mental States of Students with Different Levels of Reflexivity. In: Siberian Journal of Psychology, 96, 219–229. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/96/11 (in Russ.).

3. Kholodnaya, M. A. (2022). Light and Dark Sides of Reflection and Areflexia: The Splitting Effect. In: Psychological Journal, 43, 4, 5–26. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920021475–8 (in Russ.).

4. Verlaine, E. (2022). Discovering How to Do Reflexivity and Self-Reflexivity. A Longitudinal Empirical Research Findings. In: Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9, 8, 371–394. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.98.12931.

5. Zeer, E. F. & Stepanova, L. N. (2023). Acmeological Technology for Forecasting Individual Professionally-Oriented Trajectories of Students’ Personality Development. In: Education and Science, 25, 6, 69–98. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2023–6–69–99 (in Russ.).

6. Stingl, V. & Geraldi, J. (2023). Imagining Futures: Cognitive Processes of Desirable or Undesirable Project Prospections. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122701 (accessed: 10.10.2025).

7. Leontiev, D. A. (2025). Coping in the Context of Self-regulation. Part 2. Poly-Resource Model. In: Psychological Journal, 46, 2, 5 (12). DOI: 10.31857/S0205959225020014 (in Russ.).

8. Sunko, T. Yu., Grishel, P. V. & Lykova, N. S. (2024). Proactive Orientation of Students’ Personality: Psychometric Characteristics and Comparative Analysis. In: Clinical and Special Psychology, 13 (1), 46–57. DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2024130103 (in Russ.).

9. Behbahani, M. G. & Lajoie, D. (2024). Patterns of Individual Differences in Coping Strategies: Criterion Profile Analysis of Open Coping Strategies Data. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 223. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2024-70491-001 (accessed: 10.10.2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2024.112634 (in Russ.).

10. Pavlova, E. V., Krasnoryadtseva, O. M., Leifa, A. V., Plutenko, A. D. & Eremina, V. V. (2023). Involvement of Student Youth in the Space of Life: The Problem of Conceptualizing the Phenomenon in New Socio-Cultural Conditions. Cheboksary: Sreda publ. (in Russ.).

11. Degtyarev, V. A. & Bashlykov, T. V. (2021). The Problem of Student Involvement in Educational Activities at the Lipetsk Branch of the Financial University. In: Humanities Researches of the Central Russia, 2 (19), 88–97. DOI: 10.24412/2541–9056–2021–2–88–97 (in Russ.).

12. Maloshonok, N. G. (2023). Student Engagement as a Tool for Assessing the Quality of Education in Russian Universities. In: University Management: Practice and Analysis, 27, 2, 45–58. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2023.02.012 (in Russ.).

13. Pavlova, E. V. (2024). On the Relationship between Typological Features and Psychological Dimensions of Students’ “Engagement Resources” in the Space of Life-Sufficiency. In: Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 8, 20–28. DOI: 10.24158/spp.2024.8.2 (in Russ.).

14. Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2025). Multiple Levels in Job Demands-resources Theory: Implications for Employee Well-Being and Performance. In: Handbook of wellbeing. Salt Lake City. UT: DEF Publishers. URL: nobascholar.com (access date: 10.10.2025).

15. Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J. & Stephan, M. et al. (2024). What is the Role of Teaching Support in Students’ Motivation and Engagement Trajectories During Adolescence? A Four–year Latent Growth Modeling Study. In: Learning and Instruction, 9. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science (accessed: 10.10.2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101910.

16. Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E. & Vignoli, M. et al. (2023). Work Engagement: A metaAnalysis Using the Job Demands–Resources Model. In: Psychological Reports, 126, 3, 1069–1107. DOI: 10.1177/00332941211051988.

17. Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). What is Engagement? In: Truss, S., Alfes, K., Delbridge, R., Shantz, A. & Soane, E., Schaufeli, W. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge publ., p. 37.

18. Li, Y. & Lerner, R. (2013). Interrelations of Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive School Engagement in High School Students. In: Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2, 20–32.

19. Mitina, L. M. (2026). The Concept of Three-Component Resourcefulness of Personal and Professional Development of a Teacher: The Principle of Continuity and Emergent Effect. In: Psychological Sciences, 1, 111–126. DOI: 10.18384/3033-6414-2026-1-111-126 (in Russ.).

20. Anisimova, O. A. & Mitin, G. V. (2024). Engagement and Involvement as a Resource Complex of Personal and Professional Development of Teachers and Students. In: World of Psychology, 3, 118–129. DOI: 10.51944/20738528_2024_3_118 (in Russ.).

21. Vostokova, Yu. I. (2023). Technology of Actualization of Reflexive Design as a Resource for Personal and Professional Development of a Teacher-Psychologist. In: World of Psychology, 2, 85–94. DOI: 10.51944/20738528_2023_2_85 (in Russ.).

22. Mitin, G. V., Mitina, L. M. & Vostokova, Yu. I. (2023). Professional Deformations of Teachers and Deviations of Students During the Global Crisis: Psychological Diagnostics, Prevention, Correction. In: Psychology and Law, 2, 183–205. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2023130214 (in Russ.).

23. Mitina, L. M., Anisimova, O. A. & Mitin, G. V. (2025). Prevention and Correction of Students’ Tendency to Addictions and Delinquency: The Role of Teachers’ Psychological Resources. In: Psychology and Law, 15, 4, 128–146. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2025150407 (in Russ.).


Review

Views: 67

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3033-6430 (Print)
ISSN 3033-6414 (Online)