Transformation of chinese students’ value orientations in the context of global challenges: analysis of dynamics and influencing factors

Aim. To analyze both nature and orientation of the transformation of Chinese students’ value orientations under the influence of global challenges.
Methodology. A mixed design was used: the qualitative stage included semi-structured interviews (n= 45) with Chinese students and postgraduates from Far Eastern Federal University and Jiangsu University; the quantitative stage included an online survey (n= 532) using a modified Sh methodology, the Schwartz Institute for Value Measurement (PVQ-R2), as well as the author’s tools for evaluating value preferences. The data was processed using statistical factor analysis methods (SPSS).
Results. The multilevel transformation of the value orientations of Chinese students has been revealed. The hybrid nature of value profiles has been empirically confirmed, combining traditional Confucius’ attitudes (collectivism, reverence for elders) with globalized values of self-realization, individualism and social responsibility. Based on the analysis, a system of five key orientation factors is identified: “Traditionalism / Social harmony”, “Individual achievement / Material success”, “Intellectual and spiritual development”, “Hedonism / Quality of life”, “Justice / Social mobility”.
Research implications. A multifactorial analysis model integrating microand macro-determinants of value changes has been developed and tested. Data on the values of the generation of “children of reform and openness” have been introduced into scientific circulation. The results of the study are of practical importance for optimizing the adaptation mechanisms of Chinese students in the international academic environment. The conclusions of the work make it possible to predict the dynamics and variability of their socio-cultural integration, which is the basis for creating effective supportive programs.

1. Inglehart, R. & Welzel, K. (2011). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Moscow: New Publishing (in Russ.).

2. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values (The Essence of Human Values). New York, The Free Press

3. Qin Pengfei. (2024). Analysis of Basic Life Orientations on the Quality of Chinese Students’ Life. In: Herald of Omsk University. Series: Psychology, 3, 83–91 (in Russ.).

4. Shulga, T. I. (2024). Frustration Experienced by Young People Aged 17–25. In: Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 17, 2, 33–50 (in Russ.).

5. Erdyneeva, K. G. (2020). Cross-Cultural Approach to Study Students’ Value Orientations in the Context of Transitivity. In: Scientific Review. Series 2: Humanities, 3–4, 43–51 (in Russ.).

6. Wang, H., Gai, H. & Li, S. (2023). Person-Oriented Analysis of the Meaning of Life, Goal Orientations, and Attitudes Toward Life Among Chinese Youth (Person-Oriented Analysis of the Meaning of Life, Goal Setting, and Attitudes Toward Life Among Strong Youth). In: Behavioral Sciences (Basel), 13 (9), 748.

7. Wang Yan (2006). Value Changes in the Era of Social Transformation: Chinese Youth with Higher Education. In: Educational Studies, 32, 233–240.

8. Lu Xiao (1998). The Interface between Individualistic and Collectivistic Orientations in Chinese Cultural Values and Social Relations. In: Howard Journal of Communications, 9 (2), 91–107.

9. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Content of Human Values? In: Journal of Social Issues, 50 (4), 19–45.

10. Schwartz, S. H. & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a Theory of Universal Content and Structure of Values: Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (5), 878–891.

11. Hitlin, S. & Piliavin, J. (2004). Values: Reviving a Dormant Concept. In: Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359–393.

12. Inglehart, R. (2008). Changing Values of the Western Public from 1970 to 2006. In: Western European Policy, 31 (1-2), 130–146.

13. Inglehart, R. & Baker, V. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Preservation of Traditional Values. In: American Sociological Review, 65, 1, 19–51.

14. Moscovici, S. (1995). Social Representation: Historical View. In: Psychological Journal, 1, 3–14 (in Russ.).

15. Howarth, K. & Völklein, K. (2005). A Review of the Debate on Social Representation Theory: The British Debate. In: Culture and Society, 11, 4, 431–454.

16. Raudsepp, M. (2005). Why Social Representation Theory Is So Difficult to Understand? In: Culture and Society, 11, 4, 455–468.

17. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. K. (1986), Social Identity Theory in Intergroup Behavior. In: Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, Nelson-Hall publ., p. 42–64.

18. Tajfel, H. (1972). “Social Categorization.” Introduction to Psychological Social Science. Paris, Larousse publ., p. 272–302.

19. Ye, S., Chang, T. & Zhong, Q. (2023). Self-Directed Learning Skills in Online Learning: Comparison Between Chinese Students and International Students of African Descent. In: Applied Education and the Shape of the Future. India, Springer publ., p. 269–283.

20. Wang Peng (2017). Value Orientation of a Contemporary. Chinese Students and Its Changes. In: Journal of the Brazilian Sociological Society Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia, 3, 2, 21–39.

21. Sanches, J. (2021). Valores en Estudiantes Universitarios: Implicancias para la Formación Humana. In: Paradigma: Revista de Investigación Educativa, 28 (45), 63–88.

22. Maslova, O. V., Shlyakhta, D. A. & Yanitsky, M. S. (2020). Schwartz’s Value Clusters in Modern University Students. In: Behavioral Sciences, 10 (3), 66.

23. Kluckhohn, K. & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, Illinois, Row, Peterson publ., 319 p.