CHANGES IN THE LEARNING EFFICIENCY AND INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG STUDENTS DURING THE TRANSITIONTO DISTANCE LEARNING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2022-1-100-115
Abstract
Aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of teaching humanitarian students in the context of COVID-19: comparing the effectiveness of the implementation of individual and collaborative search projects in the conditions of full-time and in distance learning. Methodology. The effectiveness of the training was assessed by an expert based on the results of the tasks of the search project. To diagnose interpersonal behavior of students, T. Leary’s test, in L.N. Sobchik’s adaptation, was used. Results. During distance learning in the conditions of COVID-19 quarantine restrictions the learning efficiency is significantly higher. In student collaborations the learning efficiency is higher compared to individual implementation of projects. In the context of distance learning in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic the interpersonal behavior of students is changing significantly: the desire for certain dominance in normal conditions is replaced by an orientation towards submission, while apathy and antipathy are replaced by friendliness. Research implications. The study results contribute to understanding the effectiveness of distance learning in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
About the Authors
Anatoly N. Voronin
Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Antonina S. Rafikova
State Academic University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Воронин А. Н. Интеллектуальная деятельность: проявление интеллекта и креативности в реальном взаимодействии // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2006. Т. 3. № 3. С. 35-58.
2. Воронин А. Н. Интеллект и креативность в межличностном взаимодействии. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2004. 207 с.
3. Воронин А. Н. Эффективность совместной интеллектуальной деятельности при групповом решении задач // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Психологические науки. 2016. № 3. С. 22-29. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7235-2017-3-29-37
4. Дружинин В. Н. Психология общих способностей. СПб.: Питер, 1999. 368 с.
5. Дружинин В. Н., Хазратова Н. В. Экспериментальное исследование формирующего влияния микросреды на креативность // Психологический журнал. 1994. № 4. С. 67-85.
6. Польская Н. А., Разваляева А. Ю. Межличностная чувствительность в период самоизоляции: роль в выборе мер социального дистанцирования // Психологическая наука и образование. 2020. Т. 25. № 6. С. 63-76. DOI: 10. 17759/pse.2020250606
7. Потапова Е. А., Земляной Д. А., Кондратьев Г. В. Особенности жизнедеятельности и самочувствия студентов медицинских вузов в период дистанционного обучения во время эпидемии COVID-19 // Психологическая наука и образование. 2021. Т. 26. № 3. С. 70-81. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2021260304
8. Сорокова М. Г. Электронный курс как цифровой образовательный ресурс смешанного обучения в условиях высшего образования // Психологическая наука и образование. 2020. Т. 25. № 1. С. 36-50. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2020250104
9. Эффективность обучения и академическая мотивация студентов в условиях онлайн-взаимодействия с преподавателем (на примере видеолекции) / В. Н. Панферов, С. А. Безгодова, С. В. Васильева, А. С. Иванов, А. В. Микляева // Социальная психология и общество. 2020. Т. 11. № 1. С. 127-143. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110108
10. A Rubric for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing Scientific Inquiry in Psychology /j. S. Halonen, T. Bosack, Sh. Clay, M. McCarthy, D. S. Dunn, G. William Hill, R. McEntaffer // Teaching of Psychology. 2003. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 196-208. DOI: 10.1207/S15328023TOP3003_01
11. Bakar A., Shah K., Qingyu X. The Effect of Communication Barriers on Distance Learners Achievements // Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica. 2020.Vol. 29. № 5. P. 248-264. DOI: 10.24205/03276716.2020.1027
12. Bir D. D.Comparison of Academic Performance of Students in Online Vs Traditional Engineering Course // European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 2019.Vol. 22. № 1. P. 2-13. DOI:10.2478/eurodl-2019-0001
13. Cathey C. Power of peer review: An online collaborative learning assignment in social psychology // Teaching of Psychology. 2007.Vol. 34. № 2. P. 97-99. DOI:10.1080/00986280701291325
14. Creating an optimal environment for distance learning in higher education: Discovering leadership issues / E. Beketova, E. Leontyeva, S. Zubanova, A. Gryaznukhin, V. Movchun // Palgrave Communications. 2020. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 2-6. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0456-x
15. Dhawan S. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis // Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020.Vol. 49. № 1. P. 5-22. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018
16. Dikaya L., Shipitko O., Borokhovski E. Psychological Microclimate of Student Groups, Studying in Different Instructional Formats // E3S Web Conferences (UESF-2021). 2021. Vol. 258. URL: http://creativecommons.org (дата обращения: 18.05.2021). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125807076
17. Foldnes N. The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment // Active Learning in Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 39-49. DOI: 10.1177/1469787415616726
18. Guzmán J. F., Payá E. Direct Instruction vs. Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Effects on Student Learning, Behaviors, and Subjective Experience [Электронный ресурс] // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. № 12. URL: https://www.mdpi.com (дата обращения: 18.05.2021).
19. Hossain A., Rezal M.Integration of Structured Cooperative Learning in Mathematics Classrooms // International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies. 2018. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 23-29. DOI: 10.17220/ijpes.2018.01.004
20. Improving students’ creativity using cooperative learning with virtual media on static fluida concept [Электронный ресурс] / G. Gunawan, A. Harjono, H. Sahidu, Nisrina // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. Vol. 1006. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012016 (дата обращения: 18.05.2021).
21. Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education [Электронный ресурс] / T. Gonzalez, M. A. de Rubia, K. P. Hincz, M.Comas-Lopez, L. Subirats, S. Fort, G. M. Sasha // Plos One. 2020. Vol. 15. № 10. URL: https://journals.plos.org (дата обращения: 31.05.2021).
22. Ismail S. A. A., Al Allaq K. The Nature of Cooperative Learning and Differentiated Instruction Practices in English Classes [Электронный ресурс] // SAGE Open. 2019. Vol. 9. № 2. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com (дата обращения: 18.05.2021).
23. Juvenon J., Espinoza G., Knifsend C. The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement // Handbook of research on student engagement. Boston: Springer, 2012. P. 257-268. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_18
24. Liem G. A., Martin A. J. Peer relationships and adolescents’ academic and non-academic outcomes: Same-sex and opposite-sex peer effects and the mediating role of school engagement // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011. Vol. 81. P. 183-206. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010. 02013.x
25. Olesova L., Yang D. Engineering students’ cognitive learning and perceptions in a blended learning course [Электронный ресурс] // The International journal of engineering education. 2019. Vol. 35. № 6A. URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7350189 (дата обращения: 18.05.2021).
26. Robinson R. P., Doverspike D. Factors Predicting the Choice of an Online versus a Traditional Course // Teaching of Psychology. 2006. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 64-68. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top3301_10
27. Student Perspective of Class room and Distance Learning During COVID-19 Pandemicin the Undergraduate Dental Study Program Universitas Indonesia / L. R. Amir, I. Tanti, D. A. Maharani, Y. S. Wimardani, V. Julia, B. Sulijaya, R. Puspitawati // BMC Medical Education: [сайт]. 2020. Vol. 20. URL: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-020-02312-0 (дата обращения: 18.05.2021). DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02312-0
28. Tomcho T. J., Foels R. Meta-Analysis of Group Learning Activities: Empirically Based Teaching Recommendations // Teaching of Psychology. 2012. Vol. 39. № 3. P. 159-169. DOI: 10.1177/0098628312450414
Review
Views:
134
Email this article 