Personality Specialities of Multiprofile Help Organization Specialists with Different Level of Job Satisfaction
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5105-2024-4-123-140
Abstract
Aim. To compare personality qualities of specialists with different job satisfaction level.
Methodology. The study was performed in 2023 at “Systema 112” state budget organization in Moscow. The main idea of it is a comparative analysis of personality qualities of specialists with different job satisfaction level. The following methods were used: "Integral job satisfaction". The Holland test is modified by G. V. Rezapkina. Questionnaire of terminal values by I.G. Senin (Father-2). "Methods of self-attitude research (MIS)". "Social and professional relevance of the individual" (SPVL).
Results. Different job satisfaction level of specialists is not correlated their with social demographic data and is due to differences in their personality qualities and value and meaning directions, that are professional direction differentiation level, educational and professional life meaning level, needs in self-development, achievements, internal satisfaction and personality well-being level.
Research implications are addition to theoretical knowledge about job satisfaction and personality qualities correlations, possibility of obtained data application in professional selection of helping type specialists.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: This research was supported by governmental task No. №0138-2024-0017
About the Authors
Yu. A. Abdulina
Institute of Psychology of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Abdulina – Postgraduate student of Laboratory of Labour Psychology, Ergonomics, Engineer and Organizational Psychology,
13/1, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366.
A. A. Aldasheva
Institute of Psychology of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aigul A. Aldasheva – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Leading Researcher of Laboratory of Labour Psychology, Ergonomics, Engineer and Organizational Psychology,
13/1, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366.
References
1. Aldasheva A.A. Vliyanie iskhodnoj struktury lichnosti na vybor individual'nyh strategij adaptacii k ekstremal'nym usloviyam prirodnoj i social'noj sredy. // Fiziol. ekstremal. sostoyaniya i individ. zashchita cheloveka: Tezisy dokladov Vsesoyuznoj konferencii. M., 1986.
2. Bodrov V.A. Udovletvorennost' rabotoj kak sub"ektivnyj pokazatel' professional'noj prigodnosti // CHelovecheskij faktor: problemy psihologii i ergonomiki. 2007. №3(40). S. 24-26.
3. Blohina L.N., Aminova N.A. K voprosu ob ob"ektivnyh kriteriyah ocenki socionomicheskih vidov truda // Psihologiya i pedagogika: metodika i problemy prakticheskogo primeneniya. 2015. №44. S. 93-97.
4. Golubeva N.A. Uspeshnost' professional'noj deyatel'nosti i udovletvorennost' trudom social'nogo rabotnika // Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova. Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Social'naya rabota. YUvenologiya. Sociokinetika. 2011. T. 17. № 4. S. 244-248.
5. Grachev A.A. Organizacionnye faktory udovletvorennosti trudom i zhizn'yu rabochih i sluzhashchih // Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena. 2008. № 62. S. 225–230.
6. Emelin V.A., Rasskazova E.I., Ivanova T.YU. Professional'naya identichnost' i udovletvorennost' professional'noj deyatel'nost'yu kak faktory blagopoluchiya na rabochem meste // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya. 2022. № 4 S. 115-135. DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2022.04.05.
7. Il'yasov F.N. O celesoobraznosti issledovanij udovletvorennosti trudom // Sociologicheskij zhurnal. 2013. №3. S. 130-138.
8. Lubyagina A.F., Gurskaya S.P., Mel'nikova N.N. Parametry professional'nogo vybora i udovletvorennost' molodyh specialistov kar'eroj i trudom // Psihologiya. Psihofiziologiya. 2020. T. 13. № 4. S. 5–12. DOI: 10.14529/jpps200401
9. Makeeva O.V. Adaptaciya i udovletvorennost' trudom: empiricheskie issledovaniya, obobshcheniya i rezul'taty // Bibliosfera. 2015. №3. S. 87-95.
10. Ohotenko O.V. Vliyanie cennostno-smyslovyh orientacij i samosoznaniya na udovletvorennost' trudom uchitelya srednej shkoly : avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. n. Moskva, 2010. 24s.
11. Pantileev S. R. Metodika issledovaniya samootnosheniya / S.R. Pantileev – M.: Smysl, 1993. – 29 s.
12. Ponomareva O.YA., Nikitina O.YU. Udovletvorennost' trudom kak pokazatel' kachestva chelovecheskogo kapitala organizacii v usloviyah cifrovizacii // Cifrovaya transformaciya obshchestva, ekonomiki, menedzhmenta i obrazovaniya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoj konf., Ekaterinburg, 5-6 dekabrya 2019. Sedlčany : Ústav personalistiky, 2020. S. 67-74.
13. Platonina E.A. Udovletvorennost' professional'noj voennoj deyatel'nost'yu // CHelovecheskij kapital. 2021. №10 (154). S. 50-56. DOI: 10.25629/HC.2021.10.07.
14. Senin I.G. Oprosnik terminal'nyh cennostej (OTeC): Rukovodstvo. YAroslavl': NPC «Psihodiagnostika», FGI «Sodejstvie», 1991. 20s.
15. Serezhkina A.E. Diagnostika udovletvorennosti trudom sotrudnikov predpriyatij NGKKH // Upravlenie ustojchivym razvitiem. 2020. №6(31). S. 57-63.
16. Fofanova G.A., Mamedova A.S. Udovletvorennost' trudom sotrudnikov socionomicheskih professij // Sofiya; elektronnyj nauchno-prosvetitel'skij zhurnal. 2018. №2. S. 13-19.
17. Haritonova E.V. Psihologiya social'no-professional'noj vostrebovannosti lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2014. 411s.
18. Shamionov R.M. Samoaktualizaciya uchitelej i udovletvorennost' zhiznedeyatel'nost'yu i soboj // Mir psihologii: nauchno-metodicheskij zhurnal. 2020. № 2 (30). S. 143-148.
19. Yadov V.A., Kissel' A.A. Udovletvorennost' rabotoj: analiz empiricheskih obobshchenij i popytka ih teoreticheskogo istolkovaniya // Sociologicheskoe issledovanie. 1974. №1. S. 78-87.
20. Oboznov A.A., Petrovich D.L., Kozhanova I.V., Bessonova Yu.V. The construct of subjective occupational well-being: Russian sample testing // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psihologiya i pedagogika. 2020. T. 17. № 2. S. 247–262. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-2-247-262.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
98
Email this article 