Young students’ psychological readiness for active self-realization: methodological tools
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2023-1-96-109
Abstract
Aim. Verification of the “Self-realization Research Questionnaire” developed by M. R. Ginsburg (M. R. Ginsburg, 1996) as a psychodiagnostic method for determining young students’ readiness for active self-determination and self-realization.
Methodology. “Questionnaire of self-realization research” (M. R. Ginsburg, 1996), aimed at identifying the creative and reproductive attitudes of young men and women; “Questionnaire of professional attitudes of teenagers” (I. M. Kondakov, 1989); Questionnaire “Emotional attitude to the future” (M. R. Ginsburg, 1996). The study involved high school students (grades 10-11) and first-year college students aged 16-18, in all of 412 (176 boys and 236 girls). Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using exploratory factor analysis, α-Cronbach's internal consistency coefficient, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. The received materials were processed using the statistical package SPSS 23.0.
Results. It is shown that the “Self-realization Research Questionnaire” developed by M. R. Ginzburg actually reveals not the levels of creative or reproductive attitude to self-realization, but the measure of the activity-passivity of the subject in the context of self-determination. The questionnaire modified by us in terms of processing and interpreting the results of the study can become a full-fledged psychodiagnostic tool in the work of practical psychologists on the professional self-determination of early adolescence students in the post-industrial economy. Considering the subject's own activity as an important condition for successful self-realization, we called the technique "Questionnaire of activity in self-realization".
Research implications. The practical significance is determined by the demand of modern society for updating and creating modern tools for studying the readiness for professional and life self-determination of students of early adolescence in the post-industrial economy.
About the Authors
A. D. AndreevaRussian Federation
Alla D. Andreeva – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), the Head of the Laboratory of the Scientific Bases of Practical Child Psychology
Mokhovaya, 9, Moscow, 125009
A. G. Lisichkina
Russian Federation
Alena G. Lisichkina – Associate Researcher
Mokhovaya, 9, Moscow, 125009
References
1. Azbel’ A.A. Osobennosti formirovaniya statusov professional’noj identichnosti starsheklassnikov: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk [Features of the formation of the status of professional identity of high school students: abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Psychology]. St.Petersburg, 2005. 18 p.
2. Andreeva A.D., Lisichkina A.G. [The problem of professional self-determination of youth in the research of the Psychological Institute: 1920–2020s]. In: Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psihologiya [Theoretical and experimental psychology], 2022, vol.15, no.3, pp.198–210. DOI: 10.24412/2073-0861-2022-3-198-210.
3. Bagova R.H. Sub”ektivnoe prostranstvo vozmozhnogo dejstviya kak faktor samoopredeleniya lichnosti (u uchashchihsya obshcheobrazovatel’nyh shkol): dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk [Subjective space of possible action as a factor of personality self-determination (in students of secondary schools): Cand. Sci. thesis in Psychology]. Moscow, 2002. 144 p.
4. Bajtinger O.E. Psihologicheskie determinanty perezhivaniya budushchego kak problemy v yunosheskom vozraste: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk [Psychological determinants of experiencing the future as problems in youth: abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Psychology]. St.Petersburg, 1998. 17 p.
5. Bozhovich L.I. Lichnost’ i eyo formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 400 p.
6. Stepanov E.N., Bajborodova L.V., Andreev A.A., Petrova S.M. Vospitatel’nyj process: izuchenie effektivnosti. Metodicheskie rekomendacii [Educational process: the study of effectiveness. Guidelines]. Moscow, Sfera Publ., 2001. 128 p.
7. Ginzburg M.R.Psihologiya lichnostnogo samoopredeleniya: dis. … d-ra psihol. nauk [Psychology of personal self-determination: Dr. Sci. thesis in Psychology]. Moscow, 1996. 261 p.
8. Danilova E.E. [Features of the motivational sphere of modern Russian schoolchildren: content, age dynamics, the role of the educational environment]. In: Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Minin University], 2022, vol.10, no.1, pp.6–27. DOI: 10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-6.
9. Dodonov B.I. [Classification of emotions in the study of the emotional orientation of the personality]. In: Voprosy psihologii [Questions of psychology], 1975, no.6, pp.21–33.
10. Dodonov B.I. Emociya kak cennost’ [Emotion as a value]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1978. 272 p.
11. Kondakov I.M. Individual’no-psihologicheskie osobennosti podrostkov v vybore professii: dis. … kand. psihol. nauk [Individual psychological characteristics of adolescents in choosing a profession: Cand. Sci. of Psychology]. Moscow, 1989. 153 p.
12. Kondratyuk N.G., Burmistrova-Savenkova A.V., Morosanova V.I. [Savikas and E. Portfoly scale of career-adaptive abilities: psychometric characteristics of the Russian-language version on a sample of adolescents]. In: Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psihologiya i pedagogika [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy], 2021, vol.18, no.3, pp.555–575. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-3-555-575.
13. Shinina T.V., Mitina O.V. [Development and testing of the questionnaire “Readiness of teenagers for independent life”: assessment and development of life skills]. In: Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2019, vol.24, no.1, pp.50–68. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2019240104.
14. Ayotte B., Revell A., Belanger N. The examination of instrumental activities of daily living and perceived adulthood in emerging adults. In: International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 2020, vol.91, no.4, pp.467–475. DOI: 10.1177/0091415020907312.
15. Bellingtier J.A., Neupert S.D. Daily Subjective Age in Emerging Adults: “Now We’re Stressed Out”. In: Emerging Adulthood, 2019, vol.7, no.6, pp.468–477. DOI: 10.1177/2167696818785081.
16. Boisvert S., Dion J., Poulin F. Transition-To-Adulthood Profiles and Well-Being: Similarities and Distinctions Among Urban and Remote Contexts. In: Emerging Adulthood, 2020, vol.10, no.5. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com (accessed: 18.01.2023).
17. Da Guarda R.F. Measurements of the self: notes on the impacts of datafication on the representations of subjectivity within the professional context. In: Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencia da Informacao, 2020, vol.13, no.1, pp.276–288. DOI: 10/26512/rici.v13.nl.2020.29528.