psymgouПсихологические наукиPsychological Sciences3033-64303033-6414Federal State University of Education10.18384/2310-7235-2022-2-47-59psymgou-143Research ArticleСОЦИАЛЬНАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ, ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯSOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYВЗАИМОСВЯЗЬ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК И ПРЕДСТАВЛЕНИЙ О COVID-19 С АДАПТИВНЫМ РЕАГИРОВАНИЕМ НА ПАНДЕМИЮINTERDEPENDENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PERCEPTIONS OF COVID-19 WITH THE ADAPTIVE PANDEMIC RESPONSEhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-7599БорисоваА. М.BorisovaA. M.

Борисова Анастасия Михайловна – младший научный сотрудник лаборатории психологии личности

129366, г. Москва, ул. Ярославская, д. 13, к. 1

Anastasya M. Borisova – Researcher, Laboratory of Psychology of Personality

ul. Yaroslavskaya 13-1, Moscow, 129366

anamibo@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-1736КубракТ. А.KubrakT. A.

Кубрак Тина Анатольевна – кандидат психологических наук, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории психологии речи и психолингвистики

129366, г. Москва, ул. Ярославская, д. 13, к. 1

Tina A. Kubrak – cand. Sci. (Psychology), Senior Researcher of Laboratory of Psychology of Speech and Psycholinguistics

ul. Yaroslavskaya 13-1, Moscow, 129366

kubrak.tina@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9584-2950ЛатыновВ. В.LatynovV. V.

Латынов Владислав Викторович – кандидат психологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник лаборатории психологии речи и психолингвистики

129366, г. Москва, ул. Ярославская, д. 13, к. 1

Vladislav V. Latynov – cand. Sci. (Psychology), Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Psychology of Speech and Psycholinguistics

ul. Yaroslavskaya 13-1, Moscow, 129366

vladlat5@lenta.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-1788МахначА. В.MakhnachA. V.

Махнач Александр Валентинович – доктор психологических наук, заместитель директора по научной работе

129366, г. Москва, ул. Ярославская, д. 13, к. 1

Aleksandr V. Makhnach – dr Sci. (Psychology), Prof., chief Researcher, deputy director for Science

ul. Yaroslavskaya 13-1, Moscow, 129366

makhnach@ipran.ruИнститут психологии РАНРоссияInstitute of Psychology, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202217062022024759Copyright © Борисова А.М., Кубрак Т.А., Латынов В.В., Махнач А.В., 20222022Борисова А.М., Кубрак Т.А., Латынов В.В., Махнач А.В.Borisova A.M., Kubrak T.A., Latynov V.V., Makhnach A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.psymgou.ru/jour/article/view/143Цель

Цель. Анализ взаимосвязи индивидуально-психологических характеристик и представлений о COVID-19 с адаптивным реагированием (выполнением мер профилактики и поддержкой вакцинации) в ситуации пандемии.

Процедура и методы

Процедура и методы. В онлайн-опросе приняли участие 2786 человек (33,1% мужчин и 66,9% женщин) в возрасте от 14 до 82 лет из разных регионов России. Респонденты выполняли следующие методики: методику Big Five Inventory-2, Шкалу реактивной и личностной тревожности Ч. Д. Спилбергера, методику «Индикатор копинг-стратегий» Дж. Амирхана; авторскую методику «Представления о пандемии».

Результаты

Результаты. Было обнаружено, что представления о пандемии (уязвимость по отношению к коронавирусу, самоэффективность, оценки последствий пандемии, информированность о COVID-19 и причинах его появления) являлись предпосылками выполнения мер профилактики и позитивного отношения к вакцинации. Личностные черты и копинг-стратегии также оказались предикторами адаптивного реагирования на пандемию.

Теоретическая и/или практическая значимость. Результаты исследования вносят вклад в изучение проблемы психологической адаптации людей к ситуации пандемии COVID-19.

Aim

Aim. Analysis of the relationship between individual psychological characteristics and ideas about COVID-19 and adaptive response (implementation of preventive measures and vaccination support) in a pandemic situation.

Methodology

Methodology. The online survey involved 2786 people (33.1% of men and 66.9% of women) aged 14 to 82 from different regions of Russia. Respondents performed the following techniques: the Big Five Inventory-2 test, The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) by C.D. Spielberger, The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI) by J.H. Amirkhan; author’s technique “Ideas about the pandemic”.

Results

Results. The pandemic perceptions (vulnerability to the coronavirus, self-efficacy, pandemic impact assessments, awareness of COVID-19 and its causes) were found to be prerequisites for the implementation of prevention measures and a positive attitude towards vaccination. Personality traits and coping strategies have also been shown to predict adaptive responses to the pandemic.

Research implications

Research implications. The results of the study contribute to the study of the problem of psychological adaptation of people to the situation of the COVID-19 pandemic.

вакцинациякоронавирусличностные чертыпандемиясамоэффективностьстратегии совладанияCOVID-19vaccinationcoronaviruspersonality traitspandemicself-efficacycoping strategiesCOVID-19Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 20-04-60301 «Влияние психологических характеристик человека, выявляемых с помощью цифровых следов, на его отношение к проблеме коронавируса, восприятие информации и сетевую активность».The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-04-60301 “The influence of the psychological characteristics of a person, detected with the help of digital traces, on his attitude to the problem of COVID-19, perception of information and network activity”.ReferencesВлияние пандемии на личность и общество: психологические механизмы и последствия: сборник статей / отв. ред. Т. А. Нестик, А. Л. Журавлев, А. Е. Воробьева. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2021. 572 с.Vliyanie pandemii na lichnost’ i obshchestvo: psihologicheskie mekhanizmy i posledstviya: sbornik statej [The impact of the pandemic on the individual and society: psychological mechanisms and consequences: a collection of articles]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS, 2021. 572 p.Гордеева Т. О., Сычев О. А. Психологические предикторы благополучия и следования правилам здорового поведения во время эпидемии коронавируса (COVID-19) в России // Психологическое сопровождение пандемии COVID-19 / под ред. Ю. П. Зинченко. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 2021. С. 62–98.Gordeeva T. O. , Sychev O. A. [Psychological predictors of well-being and adherence to the rules of healthy behavior during the coronavirus epidemic (COVID-19) in Russia]. In: Psihologicheskoe soprovozhdenie pandemii COVID-19 [Psychological support of the COVID -19 pandemic]. Moscow, Moscow University Press Publ., 2021, pp. 62–98.Отношение к мерам профилактики COVID-19: психологические основания и возможности коррекции / А. М. Борисова, Н. Б. Горюнова, Т. А. Кубрак, В. В. Латынов, А. В. Махнач // Психология. Психофизиология. 2021. № 3. Т. 14. С. 5–18.Borisova A. M., Goryunova N. B., Kubrak T. A., Latynov V. V., Mahnach A. V. [Attitude towards the COVID-19 prevention measures: psychological grounds and possibilities for correction]. In: Psihologiya. Psihofiziologiya [Psychology. Psychophysiology], 2021, no. 3, vol. 14, pp. 5–18.Пандемия COVID-19 и конспирологические убеждения: психологические предпосылки, последствия, возможности коррекции / М. Г. Мягков, Т. А. Кубрак, В. В. Латынов, Ю. О. Мундриевская // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2021. № 467. С. 156–163.Myagkov M. G., Kubrak T. A., Latynov V. V., Mundrievskaya Yu. O. [The COVID-19 pandemic and conspiracy beliefs: psychological preconditions, consequences, possibilities for correction]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Bulletin], 2021, no. 467, pp. 156–163.Психометрика русскоязычной версии Big Five Inventory-2 / А. Ю. Калугин, С. А. Щебетенко, А. М. Мишкевич, К. Сото, О. Джон // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2021. № 1. Т. 18. С. 7–33.Kalugin A. Yu., Shchebetenko S. A., Mishkevich A. M., Soto K., John O. [Psychometrics of the Russian version of Big Five Inventory-2]. In: Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki [Psychometrics. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2021, no. 1, vol. 18, pp. 7–33.Стресс и совладание в семье в период самоизоляции во время пандемии COVID-19 / Т. Л. Крюкова, О. А. Екимчик, Т. П. Опекина, Н. С. Шипова // Социальная психология и общество. 2020. № 4. Т. 11 C. 120–134.Kryukova T. V., Ekimchik O. A., Opekina T. P., Shipova N. S. [Stress and coping in the family during self-isolation during the COVID -19 pandemic]. In: Social’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2020, no. 4, vol. 11, pp. 120–134.Anxiety of nurses to support Wuhan in fighting against COVID -19 Epidemic and its correlation with work stress and self-efficacy / Y. Mo, L. Deng, L. Zhang, Q. Lang, H. Pang, C. Liao, N. Wang, P. Tao, H. Huang// Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021. Vol. 30. № 3-4. P. 397–405.Mo Y., Deng L., Zhang L., Lang Q., Pang H., Liao C., Wang N., Tao P., Huang H. Anxiety of nurses to support Wuhan in fighting against COVID -19 Epidemic and its correlation with work stress and self-efficacy. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2021, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 397–405.Blagov P. S. Adaptive and dark personality in the COVID-19 pandemic: Predicting healthbehavior endorsement and the appeal of public-health messages // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2021. № 12 (5). P. 697–707.Blagov P. S. Adaptive and dark personality in the COVID-19 pandemic: Predicting healthbehavior endorsement and the appeal of public-health messages. In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2021, no. 12 (5), pp. 697–707.Čavojová V., Šrol J., Ballová Mikušková E. How scientific reasoning correlates with healthrelated beliefs and behaviors during the COVID -19 pandemic? // Journal of Health Psychology. 2022. Vol. 27(3). P. 534–547. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320962266Čavojová V., Šrol J., Ballová Mikušková E. How scientific reasoning correlates with healthrelated beliefs and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic? In: Journal of Health Psychology, 2022, vol. 27 (3), pp. 534–547.Chan E. Y. Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic // Personality and Individual Differences. 2021. Vol. 171. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (дата обращения: 10.10.2022).Chan E. Y. Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 2021, vol. 171. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed: 10.10.2022).Coping with COVID-19: Emergency stress, secondary trauma and self-efficacy in healthcare and emergency workers in Italy / M. Vagni, T. Maiorano, V. Giostra, D. Pajardi // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (дата обращения: 10.10.21).Vagni M., Maiorano T., Giostra V., Pajardi D. Coping with COVID -19: Emergency stress, secondary trauma and self-efficacy in healthcare and emergency workers in Italy. In: Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed: 10.10.21).Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England / D. Freeman, E. Waite, L. Rosebrock, A. Petit, C. Causier, A. East, L. Jenner, A.-L. Teale, L. Carr, S. Mulhall // Psychological Medicine. 2020. Vol. 50. Iss. 2. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals (дата обращения: 10.10.22).Freeman D. , Waite E., Rosebrock L., Petit A., Causier C., East A., Jenner L., Teale A-L., Carr L., Mulhall S. Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. In: Psychological Medicine, 2020, vol. 50, iss. 2. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals (accessed: 10.10.22).Correction: Biting the bullet: When self-efficacy mediates the stressful effects of COVID-19 beliefs / N. Meyer, T. Niemand, A Davila, S. Kraus // Plos one 2022. Vol. 17(3). URL: https://journals.plos.org (дата обращения: 10.10.21).Meyer N., Niemand T., Davila A., Kraus S. Correction: Biting the bullet: When self-efficacy mediates the stressful effects of COVID -19 beliefs. In: Plos one, 2022, vol. 17 (3). Available at: https://journals.plos.org (accessed: 10.10.21).Erceg N., Ružojčić M., Galić Z. Misbehaving in the Corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs // Current Psychology. 2020. №1 (10). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (дата обращения: 10.10.2022).Erceg N., Ružojčić M., Galić Z. Misbehaving in the Corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs. In: Current Psychology, 2020, no. 1 (10). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed: 10.10.2022).Georgiou N., Delfabbro P., Balzan R. COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs // Personality and Individual Differences. 2020. Vol. 166. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (дата обращения: 10.10.22).Georgiou N., Delfabbro P., Balzan R. COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 2020, vol. 166. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed: 10.10.22).Ideological and Psychological Predictors of COVID -19-Related Collective Action, Opinions, and Health Compliance Across Three Nations / B. L. Choma, G. Hodson, D. Sumantry, Y. Hanoch, M. Gummerum // Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 2021. Vol. 9 (1). P. 123–143.Choma B. L., Hodson G., Sumantry D. , Hanoch Y., Gummerum M. Ideological and Psychological Predictors of COVID -19-Related Collective Action, Opinions, and Health Compliance Across Three Nations. In: Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2021, vol. 9 (1), pp. 123–143.Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID -19 pandemic / P. Teovanovic, P. Lukic, Z. Zupan, A. Lazić, M. Ninković, I. Zezelj // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021. Vol. 35. P. 486–496.Teovanovic P., Lukic P., Zupan Z., Lazić A., Ninković M., Zezelj I. Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID -19 pandemic. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2021, vol. 35, pp. 486–496.Predictors of COVID -19 voluntary compliance behaviors: an international investigation / C. Clark, A. Davila, M. Regis, S. Kraus // Global Transitions. 2020. № 2. P. 76–82.Clark C., Davila A., Regis M., Kraus S. Predictors of COVID -19 voluntary compliance behaviors: an international investigation. In: Global Transitions, 2020, no. 2, pp. 76–82.Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality / D. Aschwanden, J. E. Strickhouser, A. A. Sesker, J. Lee, M. Luchetti, Y. Stephan, A. R. Sutin, A. Terracciano // European Journal of Personality. 2021. Vol. 35 (1). P. 51–66.Aschwanden D. , Strickhouser J. E., Sesker A. A., Lee J., Luchetti M., Stephan Y., Sutin A. R., Terracciano A. Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality. In: European Journal of Personality, 2021, vol. 35 (1), pp. 51–66.Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom / J. Murphy, F. Vallières, R. P. Bentall, M. Shevlin, O. McBride, T. K. Hartman // Nature Communications. 2021. № 12 (29). URL: https://www.nature.com (дата обращения: 10.10.21).Murphy J., Vallières F., Bentall R. V., Shevlin M., McBride O. , Hartman T. K. In: Nature Communications, 2021, no. 12 (29). Available at: https://www.nature.com (accessed: 10.10.21).Risk factors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of coping style and emotional regulation / N. Li, L. Fan, Y. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Huang // Journal of affective disorders. 2022. № 299. P. 326–334.Li N., Fan L., Wang Y., Wang J., Huang Y. Risk factors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of coping style and emotional regulation. In: Journal of affective disorders, 2022, no. 299, pp. 326–334.Solomou I., Constantinidou F. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID ‐19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures // Age and Sex Matter. 2020. № 2. P. 11–19.Solomou I., Constantinidou F. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID‐19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures. In: Age and Sex Matter, 2020, no. 2, pp. 11–19.Sturgis P., Brunton-Smith I., Jackson J. Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence // Nature Human Behavior. 2021. № 5. URL: https://www.nature.com (дата обращения: 10.10.21).Sturgis P., Brunton-Smith I., Jackson J. Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence. In: Nature Human Behavior, 2021, no. 5. Available at: https://www.nature.com (accessed: 10.10.21).We distance most when we believe our social circle does / B. Tuncgenc, M. El Zein, J. Sulik, M. Newson, Y. Zhao, G. Dezecache, O. Deroy // British Journal of Psychology. 2020. № 112 (2). URL: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu (дата обращения: 10.10.21).Tuncgenc B., El Zein M., Sulik J., Newson M., Zhao Y., Dezecache G., Deroy O. We distance most when we believe our social circle does. In: British Journal of Psychology, 2020, no. 112 (2). Available at: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu (accessed: 10.10.21).Women’s Narratives about COVID -19, Preventive Practices and Sources of Information in Northwestern Tanzania / Z. Mchome, G. Mshana, E. Peter, D. Aloyce, S Kapiga, H. Stöckl // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18. URL: https://www.mdpi.com (дата обращения: 10.10.21).Mchome Z., Mshana G., Peter E., Aloyce D. , Kapiga S., Stöckl H. Women’s Narratives about COVID-19, Preventive Practices and Sources of Information in Northwestern Tanzania. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, vol. 18. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com (accessed: 10.10.21).Zirenko M. S., Kornilova T. V. Individual differences in decisions on physical distancing during the COVID -19 pandemic // Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2021. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 276–286.Zirenko M. S., Kornilova T. V. Individual differences in decisions on physical distancing during the COVID -19 pandemic. In: Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2021, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 276–286.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.