psymgouПсихологические наукиPsychological Sciences3033-64303033-6414Federal State University of Education10.18384/2310-7235-2022-1-39-52psymgou-130Research ArticleСОЦИАЛЬНАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ, ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯSOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYОБЗОР ЗАРУБЕЖНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ ПОЛЯРИЗАЦИИ АТТИТЮДОВ ПРИ СПОРАХ, ДИСПУТАХREVIEW OF FOREIGN RESEARCH ON ATTITUDE POLARIZATIONIN ARGUMENTS AND DISPUTESНеврюевАндрей НиколаевичNevryuevAndrey N.annevryuev@fa.ruФинансовый университет при Правительстве РФРоссияFinancial University under the Government of the Russian FederationRussian Federation202212052022013952Copyright © Неврюев А.Н., 20222022Неврюев А.Н.Nevryuev A.N.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.psymgou.ru/jour/article/view/130

Цель. Выделить особенности поляризации аттитюдов на основе недавно проведённых исследований. Процедура и методы. Отобраны релевантные источники, использован метод критического анализа, сравнения и обобщения. Результаты. Описаны социально-демографические (неравенство в получении образования) и когнитивные (иллюзия объективности) факторы поляризации аттитюдов. Приведена классификация поляризации аттитюдов (институциональная, аффективная, идеологическая и ложная). Отмечены особенности изучения этого явления (глобальные, опасные события; политическая система страны). Выделены основные перспективные направления эмпирического исследования поляризации (различия в источниках СМИ, исследование в РФ). Теоретическая и/или практическая значимость. Результаты исследований могут быть полезны для изучения различных видов поляризации аттитюдов с учётом культурного и психологического контекста в России.

Aim. To highlight the polarization features of attitudes based on recent studies Methodology. Relevant sources were selected; the methods of critical analysis, comparison and generalization were used. Results. Socio-demographic (inequality in education) and cognitive (the illusion of objectivity) factors of attitude polarization are described. The classification (institutional, effective, ideological and false) of attitudes polarization is given. The peculiarities of studying the polarization of attitudes (global, dangerous events; the political system of the country) are noted. The main promising areas of empirical research of polarization are highlighted (research in media sources, research of the Russian Federation). Research implications. The research results can be useful for studying various types of polarization of attitudes with the condition of the cultural and psychological context in Russia.

поляризация аттитюдоваффективная поляризацияидеологическая поляризацияложная поляризацияинституциональная поляризацияpolarization of attitudesaffective polarizationideological polarizationfalse polarizationinstitutional polarizationReferencesBeam M. A., Hutchens M. J., Hmielowski J. D. Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election // Information, Communication & Society. 2018. № 21 (7). P. 940-958. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2018.1444783Beam M. A., Hutchens M. J., Hmielowski J. D. Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election // Information, Communication & Society. 2018. № 21 (7). P. 940-958. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2018.1444783Blatz C. W., Mercier B. False polarization and False Moderation // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2017. № 9 (5). P. 521-529. DOI: 10.1177/1948550617712034Blatz C. W., Mercier B. False polarization and False Moderation // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2017. № 9 (5). P. 521-529. DOI: 10.1177/1948550617712034Bosancianu C. M. A growing rift in values? Income and educational inequality and their impact on mass attitude polarization // Social Science Quarterly. 2017. № 98 (5). P. 1587-1602. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12371Bosancianu C. M. A growing rift in values? Income and educational inequality and their impact on mass attitude polarization // Social Science Quarterly. 2017. № 98 (5). P. 1587-1602. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12371Chu H., Yang J. Z. Taking climate change here and now - mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance // Global Environmental Change. 2018. № 53. P. 174-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.013Chu H., Yang J. Z. Taking climate change here and now - mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance // Global Environmental Change. 2018. № 53. P. 174-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.013Debbeler L. J., Gamp M., Blumenschein M. Polarized but illusory beliefs about tap and bottled water: A product- and consumer-oriented survey and blind tasting experiment // Science of The Total Environment. 2018. № 643. P. 1400-1410. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.190Debbeler L. J., Gamp M., Blumenschein M. Polarized but illusory beliefs about tap and bottled water: A product- and consumer-oriented survey and blind tasting experiment // Science of The Total Environment. 2018. № 643. P. 1400-1410. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.190Dias N., Lelkes Y. The nature of affective polarization: Disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity [Электронный ресурс] // American Journal of Political Science. 2021. № 1. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Dias N., Lelkes Y. The nature of affective polarization: Disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity [Электронный ресурс] // American Journal of Political Science. 2021. № 1. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America /j. N. Druckman, S. Klar, Y. Krupnikov, M. Levendusky, J. B. Ryan // Nature Human Behaviour. 2020. № 5 (1). P. 28-38. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America /j. N. Druckman, S. Klar, Y. Krupnikov, M. Levendusky, J. B. Ryan // Nature Human Behaviour. 2020. № 5 (1). P. 28-38. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5Druckman J. N., Levendusky M. S. What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2019. № 83 (1). P. 114-122. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfz003Druckman J. N., Levendusky M. S. What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2019. № 83 (1). P. 114-122. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfz003Eibach R. Ideological polarization and social psychology [Электронный ресурс] // Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. [2021]. URL: https://oxfordre.com/psychology (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Eibach R. Ideological polarization and social psychology [Электронный ресурс] // Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. [2021]. URL: https://oxfordre.com/psychology (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Fernbach P. M., Van Boven L. False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions [Электронный ресурс] // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022. № 43. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Fernbach P. M., Van Boven L. False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions [Электронный ресурс] // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022. № 43. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Gidron N., Adams J., Horne W. American affective polarization in Comparative perspective (Elements in American Politics) [Электронный ресурс] // Cambridge Core. [2020]. URL: ttps://www.cambridge.org/core (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Gidron N., Adams J., Horne W. American affective polarization in Comparative perspective (Elements in American Politics) [Электронный ресурс] // Cambridge Core. [2020]. URL: ttps://www.cambridge.org/core (дата обращения: 10.10.2021).Han J., Kim Y. Defeating merchants of doubt: Subjective certainty and self-affirmation ameliorate attitude polariztion via partisan motivated reasoning // Public Understanding of Science. 2020. Vol. 29. № 7. P. 729-744. DOI: 10.1177/0963662520939315Han J., Kim Y. Defeating merchants of doubt: Subjective certainty and self-affirmation ameliorate attitude polariztion via partisan motivated reasoning // Public Understanding of Science. 2020. Vol. 29. № 7. P. 729-744. DOI: 10.1177/0963662520939315Hutchens M. J., Hmielowski J. D., Beam M. A. Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization // Communication Monographs. 2019. № 86 (3). P. 357-376. DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2019.1575255Hutchens M. J., Hmielowski J. D., Beam M. A. Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization // Communication Monographs. 2019. № 86 (3). P. 357-376. DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2019.1575255Iyengar S., Lelkes Y., Levendusky M. The origins and consequences of Affective polarization in the United States // Annual Review of Political Science. 2019. № 22 (1). P. 129-146. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034Iyengar S., Lelkes Y., Levendusky M. The origins and consequences of Affective polarization in the United States // Annual Review of Political Science. 2019. № 22 (1). P. 129-146. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034Johnson B. K., Neo R. L., Heijnen M. E. Issues, involvement, and influence: Effects of selective exposure and sharing on polarization and participation [Электронный ресурс] // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. № 104. URL: ttps://www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Johnson B. K., Neo R. L., Heijnen M. E. Issues, involvement, and influence: Effects of selective exposure and sharing on polarization and participation [Электронный ресурс] // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. № 104. URL: ttps://www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Kim Y., Kim Y. Incivility on facebook and political polarization: The mediating role of seeking further comments and negative emotion // Computers in Human Behavior. 2019. № 99. P. 219-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.022Kim Y., Kim Y. Incivility on facebook and political polarization: The mediating role of seeking further comments and negative emotion // Computers in Human Behavior. 2019. № 99. P. 219-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.022Lees J., Cikara M. Understanding and combating misperceived polarization [Электронный ресурс] // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2021. № 376 (1822). URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Lees J., Cikara M. Understanding and combating misperceived polarization [Электронный ресурс] // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2021. № 376 (1822). URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Myers D. G., Lamm H. The Polarizing Effect of Group Discussion // American Scientist. 1975. Vol. 63. № 3. P. 297-303.Myers D. G., Lamm H. The Polarizing Effect of Group Discussion // American Scientist. 1975. Vol. 63. № 3. P. 297-303.Morisi D., Goldberg M. H., Jost J. Ideological asymmetries in motivated reasoning and the mechanisms of attitude polarization: A two-wave survey experiment [Электронный ресурс] // Annual APSA Conference 2020, Washington, September 13, 2020. URL: https://osf.io/agjz2 (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Morisi D., Goldberg M. H., Jost J. Ideological asymmetries in motivated reasoning and the mechanisms of attitude polarization: A two-wave survey experiment [Электронный ресурс] // Annual APSA Conference 2020, Washington, September 13, 2020. URL: https://osf.io/agjz2 (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Ohme J. Algorithmic social media use and its relationship to attitude reinforcement and issue-specific political participation - the case of the 2015 European immigration movements // Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2020. № 18 (1). P. 36-54. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2020.1805085Ohme J. Algorithmic social media use and its relationship to attitude reinforcement and issue-specific political participation - the case of the 2015 European immigration movements // Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2020. № 18 (1). P. 36-54. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2020.1805085Orian Harel T., Maoz I., Halperin E. A conflict within a conflict: Intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2020. № 34. P. 52-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013Orian Harel T., Maoz I., Halperin E. A conflict within a conflict: Intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2020. № 34. P. 52-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013Parker V. The Great and Widening Divide: Political False Polarization and its Consequences: a thesis … Cand. Sci. (Psychology). Wilfrid, 2018. 158 p.Parker V. The Great and Widening Divide: Political False Polarization and its Consequences: a thesis … Cand. Sci. (Psychology). Wilfrid, 2018. 158 p.Rogowski J. C., Tucker P. D. Critical events and attitude change: Support for gun control after mass shootings // Political Science Research and Methods. 2018. Vol. 7 (04). P. 903-911. DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.21Rogowski J. C., Tucker P. D. Critical events and attitude change: Support for gun control after mass shootings // Political Science Research and Methods. 2018. Vol. 7 (04). P. 903-911. DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.21Schäfer S. Illusion of knowledge through facebook news? Effects of snack news in a news feed on perceived knowledge, attitude strength, and willingness for discussions [Электронный ресурс] // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. № 103. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Schäfer S. Illusion of knowledge through facebook news? Effects of snack news in a news feed on perceived knowledge, attitude strength, and willingness for discussions [Электронный ресурс] // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. № 103. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Schmuck D., Heiss R., Matthes J. Drifting further apart? How exposure to media portrayals of muslims affects attitude polarization // Political Psychology. 2020. № 41 (6). P. 1055-1072. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12664Schmuck D., Heiss R., Matthes J. Drifting further apart? How exposure to media portrayals of muslims affects attitude polarization // Political Psychology. 2020. № 41 (6). P. 1055-1072. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12664Schwalbe M. C., Cohen G. L., Ross L. D. The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election [Электронный ресурс] // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117 (35). URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/117/35/21218 (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Schwalbe M. C., Cohen G. L., Ross L. D. The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election [Электронный ресурс] // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117 (35). URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/117/35/21218 (дата обращения: 11.10.2021).Vegetti F. The political nature of ideological polarization: The case of Hungary // The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2018. № 681 (1). P. 78-96. DOI: 10.1177/0002716218813895Vegetti F. The political nature of ideological polarization: The case of Hungary // The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2018. № 681 (1). P. 78-96. DOI: 10.1177/0002716218813895Wilson A. E., Parker V. A., Feinberg M. Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2020. № 34. P. 223-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005Wilson A. E., Parker V. A., Feinberg M. Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2020. № 34. P. 223-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.